Dilip Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6462 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2016 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== Dilip Singh Son of Shri Uday Singh Resident of Village Naugarh, P.S. Khizarsarai, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation, Bihar, Patna
3. Magadh Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mr. Jay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh For Opposite Party no. 2 :
Mr. Mayank Shekhar For Opposite party no. 3 :
Mr. Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2017 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 170 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under sections 406 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is at present the Chairman of Bihta Primary Agriculture Society. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is ready and undertakes to deposit the amount for the short supply of rice in twelve monthly instalments.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and the undertaking given by the petitioner, let the petitioner, above
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6462 of 2017(10) dt.07-11-2017 2/2 named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 170 of 2016 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. It is, however, made clear that in case petitioner fails to abide by his undertaking, the Court below shall be liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T