Amar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37454 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2015 Thana -SUPAUL District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Amar Kumar son of Birendra Kamti, resident of village + Post Office + Police Station- Ghailarh District- Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Vishoka Nand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.N.Pandit(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 15-09-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 469, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner applied for being appointed as Panchayat teacher claiming to have qualified BETET Examination on the basis of forged certificate.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not actually appointed on the basis of the alleged certificate and it was not aware it being a forged one.

A statement has been made in paragraph 3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37454 of 2015 (2) dt.15-09-2015 2/2 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the fact that actually petitioner was not being appointed on the basis of alleged forged certificate, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 109 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted on filing affidavit to the effect that he will regularly cooperate in the investigation. The non-cooperation in investigation will give liberty to the learned court below to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T