Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45289/2022dismissed

Subodh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-01Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 45289 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2021 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== SUBODH KUMAR Son of Bhagirath Ray Resident of Village - Sundrapur Sattar Ghat, P.S. Kesariya, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner along with his other associates is said to have stolen motorcycles. Four motorcycles were also seized by the police party.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty politics. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 45289 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 2/2 His name is transpired in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no recovery from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since his name has been disclosed by the apprehended coaccused, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner named above on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected.

This instant application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T