← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44100/2025bail rejected

Sukhal Dhangad @ Sukhal Dhagar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-08Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44100 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-528 Year-2025 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sukhal Dhangad @ Sukhal Dhagar son of Harendra Mahto Resident Of Village- Saidpur Ward No 06 Dhangad Toli Ps -Shikarpur District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. As per prosecution case, 10 litres illicit country made liquor was recovered from the house of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner and he is in no way connected with the aforesaid recovery. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44100 of 2025(2) dt.08-07-2025 2/2

5. On the other hand, learned APP appearing for the State submits that petitioner is not entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail in view of decision of the Full Bench of this Hon'ble Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

6. Considering the nature of accusation and aforesaid decision of this Court, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to this petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T