Bipin Yadav @ Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46665 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- GHOSWARI District- Patna ====================================================== Bipin Yadav @ Bipin Kumar, S/o Jawahar Yadav, Resident of village - Gosaigaon, PS- Ghoswari, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmveer, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard Mr. Dharmveer, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Yogendra Kumar, learned APP for the State. 2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Goshwari P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 109 and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that police received information that firing has taken place between some persons. When police reached, they found one Vikash Kumar who disclosed the police that the petitioner along with others has abused and fired at him due to which he has received gun shot injury in his right leg. He was being treated and was sent to his house. The victim did not choose to file F.I.R.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46665 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that even if statement of Vikash Kumar is taken as to be true then also it is not clear as to who has fired at him. Moreover, Vikash has not chosen to file any F.I.R. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. 5.Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Ghoswari P.S. Case No.22 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Barh, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T