Matuki Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33851 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2014 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Matuki Yadav, S/o Late Mahadeo Yadav, R/o Vill.- Nazari, P.S.- Laxmipur, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 147 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Sections 364(A),368,34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the written report it is mentioned that ransom was demanded from the mobile phone of the son of the informant when he called his son on mobile. It has been further submitted that the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet against Chandan Kumar. This petitioner has been made accused only because he is maternal grand-father of accused Chandan Kumar. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33851 of 2018(3) dt.24-08-2018 2/2 weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 147 of 2014 to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Jamui, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioner and (3) if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T