← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48104/2024bail granted

Rahul Mandal @ Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-06Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48104 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2024 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== Rahul Mandal @ Rahul Kumar, S/o Arun Mandal R/o vill - Khaira, P.S. - Khaira, Distt. - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that while he was going home after work at 10.00 P.M. when he was intercepted by the accused persons including the petitioner and they started abusing him, when informant objected, two accused caught him and petitioner assaulted him by an iron material on head causing injury.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48104 of 2024(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that the informant in a drunken condition after work was coming back to the village, an altercation took place with the villagers and the villagers chased him, on which he fell from the cycle and thus, got injured. It is next submitted that since he was in a drunken state, as such, the F.I.R. came to be instituted after a delay of one day and injury suffered by the informant is simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Khaira P. S. Case No.76 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T