← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42043/2019bail granted

Gautam Paswan @ Gautam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-12Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42043 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2019 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== GAUTAM PASWAN @ GAUTAM KUMAR S/o Arjun Paswan R/o VillageKharijama, P.S.- Roh, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kiran Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Roh P.S. Case No. 30/2019, instituted for offence under Section(s) 25(1-b)a and 26 of Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that two country made pistols and six live cartridges have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity and village politics.

Petitioner is in custody since 14.03.2019 having clean antecedent.

Keeping in view the period of custody spent by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42043 of 2019(2) dt.12-07-2019 2/2 petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Nawada, in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 30/2019, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T