Navin Singh @ Navin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21472 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -230 Year- 2010 Thana -PAROO District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Navin Singh @ Navin Kumar Son of Ramhans Singh Resident of VillageDaudpur, P.S. Paroo, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 230 of 2010 registered for offences under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. An allegation has been that the petitioner is a muscleman, he has caught hold the father of the Informant and tied his neck with the help of scarf as a result of which the victim became unconscious and threw him and a tractor ran over his body but, the statements recorded by the police suggest that the railway work was going on, the people of the area has surrounded the driver and he tried to flee away from there, while he was fleeing, the victim got injured by the said tractor and, on that account, he was killed.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21472 of 2017 (3) dt.21-08-2017 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Navin Singh @ Navin Kumar, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 230 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T