Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44465/2026bail rejected

Indrajeet Kumar @ Indarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-23Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44465 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2026 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Indrajeet Kumar @ Indarjeet Kumar S/O Sikandar Sah Resident of Village - Riga Ward No. 14, P.S.- Riga, District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in Riga P. S. Case No.93 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 109 of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 23.02.2026 at 4.00 A.M., he came out of the house to attend call of nature, when his cousin brother i.e. petitioner came from behind and assaulted him by an axe causing 4-5 injuries on head. On alarm, people gathered and caught the accused, but he fled.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44465 of 2026(2) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being agnate. It is next submitted that there is a dispute relating to land.

5. Learned A.P.P. vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that there is a specific allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the informant by axe causing 4-5 injuries on head and the injuries have been opined to be grievous in nature as recorded in the order impugned.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T