Dananjay Singh @ Dhananjay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.761 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2020 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Dananjay Singh @ Dhananjay Kumar Singh, Son of Ramnath Singh, Resident of Village - Asad (Ansar), P.S. - Siswan, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satyendra Rai, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-06-2021 Heard Mr. Satyendra Rai, the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 186 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant by means of farsa which has caused grievous injury on her head. The occurrence arose out of a trifle. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there has been a delay of four days in lodging
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.761 of 2021(2) dt.24-06-2021 2/2 the F.I.R. and according to his instruction, even the veracity of the injury report is highly suspect. It has also been urged that the petitioner is handicapped by forty percent. However, regard being had to the fact that the petitioner gave a farsa blow to the informant which caused grievous injury to her, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him.
The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner is, accordingly, rejected.
However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and seeks bail, the Court below shall consider the case on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the fact that the present anticipatory bail application has not been entertained by this Court.
The application stands dismissed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U T