Md. Nasim @ Nasin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47552 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2026 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Md. Nasim @ Nasin S/o Md. Salim Resident of vill- Kochas, P.s- Kochas, Distt.- Rohtas at Sasaram 2.

Liyas Siddiqui S/o Md. Manir Siddiqui Resident of vill- Kochas, P.sKochas, Distt.- Rohtas at Sasaram 3.

Urmila Devi W/o Raju Ram Resident of vill- Kochas, P.s- Kochas, Distt.- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 108 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 124.56 liters liquor was recovered from Tempo and the petitioners were arrested on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47552 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026 2/2 have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioners are neither owner nor driver of the tempo and they were sitting as passengers in the tempo and have no knowledge regarding the goods kept in the tempo. The petitioners are in custody since 18.04.2026 and have got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 108 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) sukriti/- U T