Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48091/2024bail rejected

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-09Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48091 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1260 Year-2023 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ravi Kumar S/o Dinesh Sahni R/o vill - Shekhpur, P.S. - Ahiyapur, Distt. - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. case No. 1260 of 2023 registered under Sections 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution allegation, in short, is that on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the accused persons including the petitioner killed the informant's brother-in-law by slitting his throat after hatching conspiracy.

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has six criminal antecedents in which, in all cases, he is on bail. General and omnibus allegation has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48091 of 2024(3) dt.09-08-2024 2/2 made against the petitioner. There is subsisting land dispute between the parties.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP submits that specific allegation of assaulting the deceased is attributed against the petitioner and the petitioner has six criminal antecedents. In view of gravity of offence, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, specific allegation and the gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the bail.

7. The prayer is rejected.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- U T