← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41842/2018dismissed

Punam Rai @ Punam Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-07Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41842 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -246 Year- 2018 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Punam Rai @ Punam Devi, Wife of Jhunna Rai @ Sri Shyam Kanaiya Rai, R/o Vill + P.O.- Birpur, P.S.- Bhawrpur, Distt.- Gajipur, Utter Pradash, presently reside at R/o Mohll.- Civil Line, P.S.- Buxar (T), Distt.- Buxar, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Panchanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Buxar (Town) P.S. Case No. 246/2018, registered for offences punishable under Section 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that she operated upon the wife of the informant though she is not a doctor. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the whole case is false and concocted and she has been falsely implicated in this case and in fact she happens to be the 'Asha Karyakarta'.

Heard learned A.P.P. also who opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41842 of 2018 (3) dt.07-08-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather she should surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T