← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./159/2016disposed

Savita Yadav v. State Of Bihar

2023-12-21Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.159 of 2016 ====================================================== Savita Yadav W/o Ranjeet Kumar, R/o Vill.- Garhi Vishanpur, P.S. Lakhisarai, Dist.- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State of Bihar through Secretary Primary Education Department, Of Education Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

4.

The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai.

5.

District Programme Officer (Establishment), Department of Education, Lakhisarai.

6.

Block Education Officcer, Ramgarh Chowk, Dist.- Lakhisarai. 7.

Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Tetarhat, P.S. Ramgarh Chowk, Dist.- Lakhisarai.

8.

Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Tetarhat, P.S.-Ramgarh Chowk, Dist.- Lakhisarai.

9.

District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal through its member. 10.

Subhash Rajak, S/o Sri Sita Ram Rajak, R/o Vill.- Nungarh, P.S. Halsi, Dist.- Lakhisarai the then Incharge Headmaster, N.S. Primary School Mushari Tetarhat.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Lalan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Sarvesh Kumar Singh (Aag13) Mr. Rajat Kumar Tiwary, AC to AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 21-12-2023 Though the present review petition has been filed for review of the order dated 10.09.2015, passed in CWJC No.14411 of 2015, but after some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since none of the grounds, as envisaged under Order 47, Rule 1 of the Code of

Patna High Court C. REV. No.159 of 2016(5) dt.21-12-2023 2/2 Civil Procedure, 1908 exists so as to warrant review of the said order nor any cogent or important evidence has been brought on record of the review petition nor there is any mistake apparent on the face of the record of the case, the review petition be granted liberty to file appropriate appeal.

2.

Accordingly, the present review petition stands disposed off as not pressed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail such alternative remedies, as are otherwise available under the law.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U