Sudish Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46897 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2021 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
SUDISH NARAYAN SINGH SON OF LATE SHAWAMI NATH SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAWADA, PS- RASULPUR, DIST- SARAN 2.
KAMALA DEVI WIFE OF SUDISH NARAYAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAWADA, PS- RASULPUR, DIST- SARAN 3.
MADHURI DEVI DAUGHTER OF SUDISH NARAYAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAWADA, PS- RASULPUR, DIST- SARAN 4.
AMIT KUMAR SINGH @ RAJESH SINGH SON OF SUDISH NARAYAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAWADA, PSRASULPUR, DIST- SARAN 5.
MUKTESHWAR KUMAR SINGH SON OF SUDISH NARAYAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAWADA, PS- RASULPUR, DIST- SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
DHOOP NARAYAN SINGH SON OF LATE BIDYA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- JHAKHARA, PS- AMNOUR DIST-SARAN ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-11-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. In the nature of prayer made in the quashing application, the Court is not inclined to entertain the same as presently the case is under investigation.
3. The learned APP for the State, at this stage, submits that since the case is under investigation, the police, may based on material collected during the course of investigation, will
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46897 of 2023(2) dt.30-11-2023 2/2 either exonerate the petitioners of the offence or will file charge sheet but then the Court, at this stage, should not interfere in the investigation of the case.
4. Considering the submission made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to entertain the quashing application, however, the same shall not denude the petitioners of approaching the appropriate forum at an appropriate stage in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the present quashing application stands rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T