Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19991/2017bail granted

Kumod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-04Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19991 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2017 Thana -SUPAUL District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Kumod Kumar, son of Sri Suresh Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village Gaurabgarh, Ward No.6, P.S. Supaul, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, 1981.

Some other candidates were appearing in the examination for the petitioner.

Submission is that cheating by impersonation is bailable one and no other allegation is made out against the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19991 of 2017 (2) dt.04-05-2017 2/2 of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, District Supaul/successor Court in connection with Supaul Police Station Case No. 90 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No. 325 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T