Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23078/2017bail granted

Mustafa Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-01Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23078 of 2017 (3) dt.01-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23078 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAINPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Mustafa Ansari Son of Late Suleman Ansari, Resident of Village- Badi Takiya, Police Station- Chainpur, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in Chainpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-307 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per written report, there is specific allegation against co-accused Sonu @ Aftab of causing injury to the informant. The allegation against the petitioner is merely of abusing the informant.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner, named above in the event of his arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23078 of 2017 (3) dt.01-07-2017 sureties of the like amount each in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Bhabua, Kaimur subject to conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T