Ishrat Khatun @ Israt Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23033 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -153 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAGARIA District- KHAGARIA ======================================================
1. Ishrat Khatun @ Israt Khatoon Daughter of Late Zahur Alam@ A. Alam Resident of Bakhri Bazar, Police station- Bakhri, District Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajeev Sah, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 23-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Khagaria P.S. Case No. 153 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
It has been submitted that the petitioner is unmarried Nanad of the informant.
From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed it is ordered that the petitioner named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23033 of 2017 (2) dt.23-05-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 153 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T