Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42055/2019dismissed

Munna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-10Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42055 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2018 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Munna Singh (Male), aged about 65 years, Son of Late Munshi Singh Resident of Village-Gohah, P.S.-Ishuapur, District-Saran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and the parties are Gotias. It is submitted that in any event, grievous injuries sustained by the informant are attributed to the other co-accused persons. The petitioner is a man of advance age of 65 years and claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP opposes the bail petition inviting reference to the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra dated 18.03.2019 passed in ABP No. 534 of 2019, according to which the injury report of Niranjan Kr. Singh who is said to have been assaulted by the petitioner with axe on his leg corroborates such accusation. It is further submitted that the accused persons have assaulted the informant causing grievous injury on temporal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42055 of 2019(2) dt.10-07-2019 2/2 and occipital regions of his head as well as Niranjan Kumar Singh who has sustained two sharp cut injuries on his chest and lower limps.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

6. If the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail before the learned trial Court the same shall be considered on its own merit in accordance with law and without being prejudiced by any observation in the present order.

(Vikash Jain, J) BT/- U T