Vinay Vikram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55035 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2021 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== VINAY VIKRAM S/o Suresh Das @ Surendra Das Resident of Village - Hanuman Nagar, P.S. - Rosera, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mahendra Pratap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution case, in short, is that 5.655 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of the motorcycle in question. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55035 of 2021(2) dt.03-12-2021 2/2 suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 5.655 liters wine is recovered from the motorcycle in question. The said motorcycle was given by the petitioner to his co-villager for his personal use. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the nature of goods kept in the motorcycle. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IIcum- Special Judge, Excise, Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 219 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T