Suraj Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45638 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2025 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Suraj Paswan Son of Late Kariman Paswan Resident of village - Chanhat, P.S.- Haspura, District - Aurangabad, Bihar.

2.

Jitan Paswan Son of Late Lakhan Paswan Resident of village - Chanhat, P.S.- Haspura, District - Aurangabad, Bihar.

3.

Lakshman Paswan Son of Late Mahavir Paswan Resident of village - Chanhat, P.S.- Haspura, District - Aurangabad, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Ms. Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 132 and 121(2) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the 15 F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, as well as several unknown persons, assaulted police party as a result of which two police officials sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45638 of 2025(3) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of identification of local chowkidar.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they, along with other accused persons, assaulted police party and created hindrance in discharge of their official duties. Petitioners have got one criminal antecedent.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and criminal antecedent of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T