Saroj Bharti And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23538 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2014 Thana -KHUTAUNA District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Saroj Bharti, W/o Ashok Kumar Mandal,

2. Ashok Kumar Mandal, S/o Jhabbar Mandal, both are resident of Village- Tengrar, P.S.- Khutauna, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Khutauna P.S. Case N0. 90 of 2014, disclosing offences under Sections 420,465,468,471,353 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against petitioner No.1 is that she secured her appointment as Block Teacher by furnishing forged documents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the accusation against the petitioner is based on incorrect facts, which the petitioner is in a position to satisfy the Investigating agency.

Considering the above, this application on behalf of petitioner No.1 is allowed.

Let the petitioner No.1 above named in the event of her arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in Khutauna P.S. Case No. 90 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present herslef before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on her part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, her bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No.2 has been arrested during the pendency of this application and this application so far as it relates to petitioner no.2 has become infructuous. This application of behalf of petitioner No.2 stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U