← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49381/2024allowed

Bam Bam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49381 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2022 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== BAM BAM YADAV SON OF JAI NANDAN YADAV R/O- VILLAGEMORKAHI, WARD NO. 14, P.S.- MUFFASIL, DISTT.- KHAGARIA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, informant was going by his motorcycle to his Sasural. In the way, three miscreants came on a motorcycle (without number plate) out of them, one caught his shirt collar and two miscreants, snatched his bike key and took out Rs. 3000/- and mobile from his pocket and fled away.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Neither

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49381 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 the petitioner is named in the FIR nor put on TIP. His name surfaced in this case in confessional statement of apprehended co-accused Prashant Kumar. Save and except confessional statement of co-accused, nothing has come against the petitioner. No any looted item has been recovered from his conscious possession. Similarly situated other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated11.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 85985 of 2023. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 7.12.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. IV, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 329 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U