Ranjeet Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.16091 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -KASBA District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Ranjeet Kumar Sah, son of late Bhola Prasad Sah, resident of village Madar Ghat, P.S. Kasba, District- Purnea.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 28-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
The Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kasba P.S. Case No.19 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 467, 468, 420, 406, 120-B Indian Penal Code.
Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that mere vague allegation has been made in the written report. Petitioner is a Postman in the Post Office. He has no concern with encashment of Kisaan Vikaas Patra. Further submission is that no detail of Kisaan Vikaas Patra, which is said to have matured, has been given by the informant in the written report. Case diary has been received.
Learned APP has submitted that there is no detail of Kisaan Vikaas Patra, which is said to have matured, in the case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16091 of 2017 (3) dt.28-06-2017 2/2 diary.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Kasba P.S. Case No.19 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and
(3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T