← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24056/2017bail granted

Akashyawar Tiwari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-01Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24056 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -146 Year- 2015 Thana -JALALPUR District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Akashyawar Tiwari Son of Khub Lal Tiwary

2. Motijhari Kuar Wife of Late Ashok Tiwary Both are residents of Village - Mangalapur, Mathiya, P.S. - Jalalpur, District - Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State.

In the present case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 146 of 2015 (Tr. No. 1281 of 2017) for offence under Sections 323, 498(A), 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner no.1 is the uncle and petitioner no.2 is the mother-in-law of the victim.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Akashyawar Tiwari and Motijhari Kuar, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24056 of 2017 (2) dt.01-07-2017 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IX, Saran at Chapra in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 146 of 2015 (Tr. No. 1281 of 2017), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioners for investigation/interrogation, they will remain present and if they would not present themselves, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T