Ranjan Yadav @ Rajja Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51177 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2022 Thana- PARBATTA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav @ Rajja Yadav S/O Bijendra Yadav @ Bijo Yadav R/O VillageLatra, Ps. Gopalpur, Dist. Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-08-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

3. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 78 of 2022 dated 18.07.2022 registered for the offence punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants boarded on a motorcycle came and dashed the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51177 of 2023(2) dt.17-08-2023 2/3 informant's motorcycle. It is further alleged that on the point of pistol, the miscreants snatched the bag of the informant in which money was kept.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up on the basis of self confessional statement. No TIP was conducted by the prosecution. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated coaccused has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.06.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12143 of 2023. The petitioner has seven other criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 29.09.2022.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51177 of 2023(2) dt.17-08-2023 3/3 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhagalpur, in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 78 of 2022 with the following condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) jyoti/- U