Rishi Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45083 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2018 Thana -SANHOLA District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Rishi Yadav S/o Fagu Yadav,
2. Gunja Devi W/o Rishi Yadav,
3. Rajnigandha Devi W/o Rishi Yadav, All R/o Vill.- Shreechak, P.S.- Sanhaula, District- Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 91/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 342, 341, 379, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the son of the informant by knife causing injury.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they are neighbours and the dispute arose with regard to cowshed and he has falsely been implicated in this case and injuries are simple in nature.
Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant, they have opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45083 of 2018 (3) dt.16-08-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 91/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T