Karyanand Kriti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43833 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2025 Thana- TARAPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Karyanand Kriti son of Devendra Prasad Yadav Resident of village - Garhi, Bishanpur, Police Station - Lakhisarai, District - Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and similarly situated co-accused, namely, Juhi Kumari had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 37619 of 2025 and the same was allowed by this Court by an order dated 18.06.2025 (Annexure-2). It is further submitted that informant alleges that appointment of the petitioner as male nurse has been found forged and fabricated and thus the petitioner has been removed from the service.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43833 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is also submitted that prior to instituting the instant FIR, no explanation was sought from the petitioner. It is submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner to explain his side of the case perhaps in that event the FIR might not have been instituted.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Tarapur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T