Raghuraj Kumar @ Prakash Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3717 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2020 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== RAGHURAJ KUMAR @ PRAKASH SAH S/o Kanhaiya Prasad @ Kanhaiya Sah Resident of Vill.- Dahiyawa Brahaman Tola, P.S.- Chhapra Town, Distt.- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No.217 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25 (1-b)a/26 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, one loaded country made pistol with a live cartridge has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3717 of 2021(2) dt.17-03-2021 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicious statement of informant, as he denied dancing at the tune of the strong people of the locality. The petitioner has got four criminal antecedent as per para-3 of the bail application and has been languishing in custody since 1205-2020. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, after framing of the charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No.217 of 2020.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T