Sita Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28637 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2016 Thana -RAJPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Sita Devi wife of Yogendra Sah,

2. Geeta Devi, wife of Kunal Sah,

3. Sonapati Devi, wife of Kundan Sah,

4. Kunal Sah @ Kunal Kumar, son of Yogendra Sah, &

5. Kundan Sah @ Kundan Kumar, son of Yogendra Sah, all resident of village-Madhuaha Brit, P.S.-Rajepur, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastriji, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Rajepur P.S. Case No.47 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B/34 Indian Penal Code.

Husaband is already in custody. Petitioners are family members of the husband of the deceased. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28637 of 2017 (3) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 six weeks from today in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No.47 of 2016, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T