Mokhtar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47106 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-164 Year-2018 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Mokhtar Manjhi, Son of Late Simari Manjhi, Resident of Village- Ishmilpur, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Garkha P.S.Case No. 164 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 379, 307, 504 and 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the written report, it is alleged that this petitioner assaulted the informant with sword when he came to raise protest for passing abusive language against his wife. The injury report of the injured has been annexed as Annexure-2 which shows that all the injuries were caused by hard and blunt substance and opinion with respect to the injury was kept reserved due to X-ray and C.T. Scan of brain was suggested. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47106 of 2018(3) dt.29-08-2018 2/2 of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Garkha P.S.Case No. 164 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM-14, Saran, Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T