← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55432/2021bail granted

Rohan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55432 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-558 Year-2020 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

ROHAN PRASAD Wife of Dular Chand Gope Resident of VillageHasanpur, P.S.- Ghosi (Okari), District- Jehanabad. 2.

Anil Kumar @ Chhotan Kumar Son of Rohan Prasad Resident of VillageHasanpur, P.S.- Ghosi (Okari), District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rohit Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, while the informant was working in his field he saw that all the accused persons were cutting ridge of his field and on protest they assaulted him and his sister-in-law.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. Specific allegation of assault is against co-accused,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55432 of 2021(2) dt.28-06-2022 2/2 Tuntun Kumar. So far these petitioners are concerned there is general and omnibus allegation that three accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted the informant and his sister-in-law with Lathi as a result of which they sustained injuries. There is case and counter case. It is submitted that there is no allegation of repetition of blow and injury is not on the vital part of the body. Petitioners have got clean antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Ghosi (Okari) PS case No. 558/2020, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T