Md. Riyajuddin @ Mohammad Reyaz Uddin v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45231 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2024 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.
Md. Riyajuddin @ Mohammad Reyaz Uddin, S/O Md. Suleman @ Suleman Resident of village - Prithivipatti, Ward No. 07, Police Station - Bhaptiyahi, District - Supaul 2.
Md. Merajuddin @ Md. Merazuddin, S/O Md. Suleman @ Suleman Resident of village - Prithivipatti, Ward No. 07, Police Station - Bhaptiyahi, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun, Advocate.
For the State :
Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Bhaptiyahi PS. Case No. 249 of 2024 dated 06.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 76, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.
3. The prosecution case as emerging from the FIR is that on account of land dispute, occurrence took place leading to injuries on both sides and lodging of case and counter case. The counter case filed by the petitioner side is Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 251 of 2024.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45231 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the injury caused on the person of the informant side is simple in nature.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
7. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioners above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below, in connection with Bhaptiyahi PS. Case No. 249 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45231 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 3/3 (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedent, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.
(Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T