Patna High CourtCWJC/4257/2016disposed

Kanak Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4257 of 2016 ====================================================== Kanak Kumari, daughter of Baleshwar Prasad Singh Resident of Gola Road, P.O.- Barh, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, HRD Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Bihar School Examination Board (Secondary), through its Secretary, Budh Marg, Patna.

4. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (Secondary), Budh Marg, Patna.

5. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (Secondary), Budh Marg, Patna.

6. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (Secondary), Budh Marg, Patna.

7. Syed Nehal Ahasn College, Barh, through its Secretary Governing Body, District- Patna.

8. The President, Governing Body, Syed Nehal Ahsan College, Barh, DistrictPatna.

9. The Principal, Syed Nehal Ahsan College Barh, District- Patna.

10. Anuj Kumar, Department of Sociology, Syed Nehal Ahsan College Barh, District- Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prasoon Sinha- Ga2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 The grievance of the petitioner is in relation to the constitution of the Governing Body/Managing Committee of Syed Nehal Ahsan College, Barh.

The petitioner has alternative remedy of appeal before Bihar Anudanit Shikshan Sansthan Pridhikar (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Pradhikar'), constituted under Anudanit Shikshan Sansthan Pradhikar Niyamawali, 2015. The petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.4257 of 2016(11) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 shall be at liberty to avail her remedy by filing appropriate application before the Pradhikar.

This writ application stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.

It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises, the Pradhikar will consider the fact that the petitioner had been pursuing her case before this Court by filing the present writ application.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) HR/- U