Tripit Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45060 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2024 Thana- BHEJA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Tripit Narayan Yadav S/o Late Laxman Yadav R/o Village - Darah Nawtoliya, P.S. - Bheja, District - Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 104 of 2024, instituted for the offences under Sections 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 75, 303(2), 324(4), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and later on Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 was added.
3.
This is the second attempt of the petitioner for bail. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 07.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22176 of 2025 taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45060 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 2/3 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.11.2024 without any rhymes or reason and has got six criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that previously the petitioner was granted liberty of six months to renew his prayer before the learned Trial Court, if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months. It is further submitted that charge has not been framed against the petitioner.
5.
Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.
Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 104 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45060 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 3/3 dates without sufficient cause.
(III) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence or the witnesses during the trial.
(IV) Petitioner shall not commit offence of similar nature in future.
If any of the above conditions are violated, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T