Rampati Mahto v. The Central Board Of Direct Taxexs And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1901 of 2016 ====================================================== Rampati Mahto, son of late Bhagan Mahto, permanent resident of villageGyaspur, P.O.-Gyaspur, P.S.-Siswan, District-Siwan and presently posted as Additional Assistant Director of Income Tax under Additional Director General (Exam), Mayur Bhawan, New Delhi-110001. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001, through its Chairman Sri Atulesh Jindal, Fathers name not known to the petitioner.

2. Manoj Joshi, Son of not known to the petitioner, Additional Director General (Exam)-cum-Disciplinary Authority, Mayur Bhawan, Canought Circus, New Delhi-110001.

3. Ashok Kumar Pandey, fathers name not known to the petitioner, Director of Vigilance (North), Central Revenue Building, Indraprastha Estate, New Delhi-110002.

4. Surinder Paul Klair, the then Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, SC-I, New Delhi.

5. R.K. Rai, the then Inspector, Central Bureau of Investigation, SC-I, New Delhi.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akashdeep, Adv. For the O.P.Nos.2&3 : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan, Asstt.S.G. For C.B.I. : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SC, CBI. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-08-2018 Initiation of a departmental proceeding after passing of the order dated 20.04.2010 in CWJC No.12334 of 2009 cannot be said to be an order taking coercive action against the petitioner and, therefore, no case for contempt is made out. The application is dismissed.

Arvind/- (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) U