Patna High CourtMJC/2360/2016dismissed

Satyendra Narayan Singh And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-21Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2360 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11397 of 2009 ======================================================

1. Satyendra Narayan Singh, son of Shiva Pujan Singh, resident of VillageBisunpura, Post Office- Imadpur, P.S.- Tarari, District- Bhojpur.

2. Madheshwar Sharma, son of Bachu Sharma, resident of Village- Arap, P.O.- Arap, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna.

3. Yogendra Sharma, son of Ramashish Sharma, resident of Village- Arap, P.O.- Arap, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna.

4. Sudhir Kumar Rai, son of Chandradeo Rai, resident of Village and Post Office- Nonar, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur.

5. Rajesh Singh, son of Rabindra Nath Singh, resident of Village- Paiga, Post Office- Gundi, P.S.- Barhara, District- Bhojpur.

6. Nand Lal Ram, son of Sri Somaru Ram, resident of Village and P.O. Dhangaien, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, the Management of Executive Engineer, Son Canal Division, Bikramganj, Rohtas under the Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Arun Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Rameshwar Chaudhary, The Chief Engineer Water Resources Department Dehri, District- Rohtas.

5. Sri Rajesh Kumar, The Superintending Engineer, Canal Circle Ara, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ga1 Shyam Kishore Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 3.

21-08-2018 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Pointing out Annexures-A & B to the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party Nos. 2 to 5, learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the order of the learned writ court has already been complied with. It is pointed out that in fact

Patna High Court MJC No.2360 of 2016 (3) dt.21-08-2018 the petitioners have already received payment in terms of the award and there is nothing to proceed with the contempt application.

This contempt application is dismissed, accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U