Neeraj Kumar Singh @ Neeraj Singh @ Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46060 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Neeraj Kumar SIngh @ Neeraj Singh @ Niraj Kumar S/o Jaynarayan Singh Resident Of Village- Marachhi, P.S.- Jamo Bazar, Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Sr. Advocate :
Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, Advocate :
Mr. Nikhila Kumar Singh, Advocate :
Ms. Nikita Mittal, Advocate :
Mrs. Smriti Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that this petitioner was apprehended by the police with a stolen motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46060 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 2/3 that petitioner has got no concern with the looted articles. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 02.02.2025 and has six criminal antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submitted that this petitioner was apprehended along with stolen motorcycle.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:
(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46060 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2025 3/3 (III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T