← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48582/2024bail granted

Vivek Kuamr Ray @ Bittu @ Vivek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-14Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48582 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-420 Year-2023 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Vivek Kumar Ray @ Bittu @ Vivek Kumar S/O Sohan Prasd Ray R/O Mohalla Gautam Nagar Gangiala, Ward No. 16, P.S And Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2024 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Supaul PS case no. 420 of 2023, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 354(D), 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of Information Technology Act. 3.

The prosecution story, as per the First Information Report, is that the marriage of informant's daughter was performed with one Varun Kumar on 23.01.2023. After the marriage, the petitioner along with his father prepared the joint photograph of informant's daughter and the petitioner and made it viral on social media in order to tarnish the character of the informant and his daughter. Petitioner and others also threatened the informant and his family members of dire

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48582 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 2/3 consequences.

4.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that cousin sister of the petitioner is married with the nephew of the informant and there was marriage proposal of informant's daughter with the petitioner, which was rejected by petitioner's father, upon which, the informant has lodged the present F.I.R. on the basis of concocted story. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is a student and has already passed B.C.A. examination and is preparing for competitive examination. He next submits that the photographs, which have been made part of the F.I.R., is not very objectionable.

5.

Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that both parties are known to each other, petitioner is a student having no criminal antecedent, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

7.

Let petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48582 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 3/3 connection with Supaul PS case no. 420 of 2023, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) rinkee/- U T