← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9581/2020disposed

Mahanth Parmanand Saheb @ Acharya Mahanth Parmanand Das v. The State Of Bihar

2021-06-29Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9581 of 2020 ====================================================== Mahanth Parmanand Saheb @ Acharya Mahanth Parmanand Das Late Mahanth Rameshwar Das Resident of Kabir Math, Dariyapur, Police StationFatuha, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Law Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The State Board of Religious Trust Board, thorugh its Chairman Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

3.

The Chairman, Bihar HIndu Religious Trust, Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna. 4.

The Sub-Divisional Oficer, Patna City, Patna. 5.

Mukesh Ranjan Son of Not Known to the Petitioner at Present Posted as Sub-Divisional Officer, Patna City, Patna.

6.

The Circle Officer, Fatuha, 7.

The Block Agricultural Officer, Fatuha, 8.

The Officer Incharge, Fatuha Police State, Fatuha, Patna. 9.

Brajesh Das @ Brajesh Muni Son of Lilak Roy Resident of VillageMohanpur, Police Staton-Raghopur, District-Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Mahasweta Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ganpati Trivedi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2021 Heard Ms. Mahasweta Chettarji, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, learned counsel for the Bihar State Religious Trust Board. Ms. Mahasweta Chettarji, learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that this writ petition has become infructuous and as such she does not press this writ petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U