← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47181/2023bail granted

Raukins Kumar @ Govind @ Bantha @ Rakins Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-03Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47181 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2022 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Raukins Kumar @ Govind @ Bantha @ Rakins Kumar Son Of Chandra Bhushan Chaudhary @ Munna Chaudhary Resident Of Village - Fateha, P.S. - Bachhwara, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surya Narayan Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 05.11.2022 in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No.283 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 04.11.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

Recovery is of one loaded country made pistol and five live cartridges from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that bare perusal of F.I.R. as well as seizure list that one loaded country made pistol and five live cartridges have been recovered from the possession of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47181 of 2023(2) dt.03-08-2023 2/3 petitioner. He further submits that there is non-compliance with mandatory procedure prescribed for recovery under Section 100 of Cr.P.C. and the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 05.11.2022.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other than the present one.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Concerned Court, Begusarai in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No.283 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47181 of 2023(2) dt.03-08-2023 3/3

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T