← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1440/2025dismissed

Narendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2025-07-28Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1440 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Patna ====================================================== Narendra Kumar S/o- Late Ramhari Singh Village- Jahanpur Po- Pabhera PsDhanarua District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna Bihar 3.

The Inspector General of Police, Patna Bihar 4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna Bihar 5.

The Superintendent of Police, East, Patna Bihar 6.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Masaurhi-2, Punpun, Patna Bihar 7.

The Police Inspector, Masaurhi, Patna, Bihar Bihar 8.

The Officer Incharge, Dhanarua, Patna Bihar 9.

Patnaj Kumar, Junior Electric Engineer, Electric Supply Offices, Dhanarua Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Neelam Kumari For the Respondent/s :

S.C.9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court for the following reliefs:- (i) For commanding the respondent no.8 to institute a case against the respondent no.9, as already submitted on 17.02.2025 before the respondent no.8 and also taking departmental action who have misused their authority.

(ii) For commanding the respondent no.1 to 7 to take legal action as departmental proceeding against the respondent no.8 and respondent no.9.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1440 of 2025(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 (iii) For commanding the respondents to arrest the respondent no.9, after lodging FIR against him including for taking departmental action against the responsible officers, who have misused their authority.

(iv) For commanding the respondent no.1, 2 and 3 to hold an independent and fair investigation. (v) For any other relief(s) to which the petitioner is entitled to in the eye of law.

3. It appears that the petitioner was proceeded against by one Pankaj Kumar, Junior Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Office, Dhanarua, Bihar/ respondent no.9, and the petitioner wants to register an F.I.R. against him through this Court.

4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to pass any order for registration of the F.I.R.

5. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) shikha/- U T