Hamid Khan @ Samsad Mian v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57643 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2021 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== HAMID KHAN @ SAMSAD MIAN S/O RASHID EMAM KHAN R/o village- Sahdeokhap, P.S.- Magadh University, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 342, 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner along with other accused persons demanded Rangdari of Rs. 10,000/- from the informant when he was carrying cattle.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case only on suspicion. There is no evidence on record to connect this petitioner in the aforesaid crime. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioner is named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57643 of 2021(2) dt.30-06-2022 2/2 in the FIR and there is allegation of demanding Rangari agains him.

Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T