Anil Chaudhary @ Anil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51224 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2015 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Anil Chaudhary @ Anil Singh S/O Rajeshwar Chaudhary @ Rajeshwar Singh @ Faudar Chaudhary R/O Vill - Thekahi Raghunathpur (Wrongly Stated As Thekahi Balirampur) P.S. - Nokha, Dist - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Sunil For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 353, 427, 504, 323, 324, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 8 of 2015.

3. As per prosecution case, while the informant was doing paper work relating to Mid-day meal, in the meantime the petitioner and co-accused Surendra Chaudhary entered in his office in drunken condition and asked for the Register. It is further alleged that the petitioner forcibly snatched the Admission Register and torn it into pieces and snatched Rs. 5,000/- from the informant and also caused injury to one Raju

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51224 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2024 2/3 Kumar with needle. Accordingly, the FIR.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has committed no offence. The present dispute arose with respect to the payment of dress allowance and scholarship amount to the son and daughter of the petitioner and his brother's children and when no satisfactory reply was given by the informant, then some hot exchange of word took place, resulting in lodging of the present case. Petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and he is in custody since 27.05.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner having clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 8 of 2015, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court.

7. If it is found that the petitioner is involved in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51224 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2024 3/3 any other case of similar nature, learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Arish/- U T