Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50440 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2018 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== Subodh Kumar Singh Son of Shree Vinod Singh R/O Vill.- Senduyar, P.S.- Janta Bazar, Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Priyanka Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in a case instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 386, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. When the informant proceeded with his pickup vehicle loaded with Choker worth Rs. 30,458/- (thirty thousand four hundred fifty eight rupees), in the way, six miscreants riding on three motorcycle overtook him. At the point of gun, they snatched the mobile and Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand rupees) form the informant. It is further alleged that miscreants overtook his vehicle and made him
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50440 of 2024(5) dt.24-02-2025 2/3 sit on their motorcycle. They took him to the house of one Dablu Singh where they unloaded 20 baggs of choker and assaulted him with fist.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has no concern either with the informant or with the alleged offence. Informant has not disclosed the name of petitioner. The name of petitioner sprang up in this case on the basis of disclosure of some unknown person. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged motorcycle. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.
6. From perusal of the case diary, it appears that nothing incriminating has been seized from the conscious possession of this petitioner and petitioner is not owner of seized motorcycle. The TIP has not been conducted in the present case.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50440 of 2024(5) dt.24-02-2025 3/3 above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Ekma P.S. Case no. 320 of 2018, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge XI, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Prabhakar/- U T