← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46545/2022allowed

Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-07Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46545 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2020 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar Son Of Upendra Yadav Resident Of VillageNayapatti Bistoriya, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Raniganj, District - Araria (BIhar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 163 of 2020 registered under sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 447, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons is that they assaulted the informant and his brother, namely, Jeevan Kumar for land dispute.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this present case due to land dispute and previous enmity. It is further submitted that from perusal of the injury report, there is no obvious bony injury seen in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46545 of 2022(3) dt.07-02-2023 2/2 bone window. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He is languishing in judicial custody since 07.06.2022. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 163 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Araria.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T