Shyamdeo Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19146 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Shyamdeo Yadav S/o Late Chandradeo Yadav, Resident of Village - Birbal Bigha, P.s. - Nabinagar, District - Aurangabad.

2. Madodar Kumar, S/o Sri Mungeshwar Singh, Resident of Village - Sahaspur, P.S. - Barun, District - Aurangabad.

3. Umesh Chauhan, S/o Late Deo Sharan Chauhan, Resident of Village - Mahtha, P.S. - Barun, District - Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Water Rsources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad.

5. The Superintendent Engineer, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad.

6. The Executive Engineer, Sone High Level Canal Division, Aurangabad.

7. The Collector, Aurangabad.

8. The District Establishment Add. Collector, Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nirbhay Kumar Singh- GP26 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No.19348 of 2015 (Purshotam Dwivedi & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case. In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and relief of the case of petitioners and if it

Patna High Court CWJC No.19146 of 2015 dt.14-09-2018 2 /2 is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioners. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date19.9.2018 Transmission Date NA