Sidheshwar Das v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27847 of 2017 (3) dt.12-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.27847 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -89 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHKAR District- GAYA ====================================================== Sidheshwar Das, Son of Shyam Keshwar Das, Resident of MohallaKishori Mohan Complex Road No. 4, House No. 55, P.S. M.M.C.H., District- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahakar P.S. Case No. 89 of 2016, registered under Sections 406, 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accusation is that Binay Paswan @ Ginni Paswan, co-villager of informant, Satyendra Manjhi, approached to the informant and other villagers and persuaded for opening the bank account at Zero balance in Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank. Accordingly, he took two photographs and identity cards of the informant and other villagers and also took signature on the papers of Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank. In the meantime, a notice regarding bank loan of Rs.1,50,000/- sent by the Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Kurwa, Gaya to the informant and other villagers
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27847 of 2017 (3) dt.12-09-2017 while the loan was not taken by them. Thereafter, the informant came to know that loan have been sanctioned to him as other villager using the photographs, identity card and signatures and the papers provided by Binay Paswan on the pretext to open the account on zero balance in collusion of the Branch Manager of the Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, petitioner is the Branch Manager of Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank and he has falsely been implicated in this case by the informant, who is the loanee of the bank, only to give undue pressure to avoid the payment of loan amounts.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Mahakar P.S. Case No. 89 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T