Vinay Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44414 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Vinay Mandal S/o- Pradip Mandal Vill - Rustampur, P.S - Kawakole, Dist - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 87 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3.

On 23.03.2025, informant alleged that her 15-yearold daughter went missing after going to the field, and she learnt that Vinod Mandal and Raushal Kumar had taken her away on a motorcycle with support of Vinod's family members. When she approached their house, the family abused, threatened, and attempted to assault her.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08-05-2025. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44414 of 2025(7) dt.22-09-2025 2/2 paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as petitioner happens to be brother of Vinod Mandal. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the present one is not the case of kidnapping, rather there is love affairs between Vinod Mandal and daughter of the informant. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T